Tuesday, September 14, 2010

The Alchemy of Silence


The last few posts I have been commenting on reinvention and the task of adopting roles (particularly at work) that cause you to stand out from the herd, in the minds of the Powers That Be. I have been careful to emphasize that I am referring to APPROPRIATE ATTENTION, mind you, using the illustration of how Court Jesters can attract attention but never be taken seriously.


For some personality types, the temptation is to think that the role that attracts the most attention is the gadfly. First of all, most offices already have this actor. so you won’t be standing out all that much. Second, the incessant talker who insists on chiming in on every topic of conversation, no matter how inane, is, as everyone knows except the gadfly, annoying. Not exactly the image of authority, eh?

But what about the person who, eschewing the inane, feels that he must have something important to say, something “valuable” to add to the “important” conversations? While you certainly do not want an image of being the Fifth Wheel--an unnecessary appendage that can easily be removed without any measurable loss--adding your two-cents so as to always be seen as a contributor is worth … what? Two-cents?

Silence is Golden
In my last post, I suggested that extroverts may want to consider refraining from a constant need to be transparent, so as to create an air or aura of mystery. This is different from the silence that is due to fear or insecurity. “What if I say something wrong or stupid?” No, the role I am referring to is the one used by actors such as Mitchum or Burton, whose serene stillness attracted the most attention.

Think about it: In an age where everyone is preening, posturing and prattling on and on so as to grab his or her Fifteen Minutes of Fame, it seems to me that, today,

Less is More

Minimalism Trumps Maximalism

Or at least this is a possibility that you may want to consider when creating your role.

Saying less, remaining silent when everyone else around you is speaking, can be a challenge.

Have you ever noticed how many people expect you to share your every thought, to be “honest” about your feelings regarding everything being discussed, and then insist on interpreting every word you have spoken? Of course, his or her interpretation is The Truth, regardless of your protestations! Have you also noticed how many of these same people then use that information to control you? “This is who you are!” “That is what you said.” Thereby putting you into a box from which, in their minds, you will never escape.


If Information is Power, then information given at the most appropriate time and in the most succinct manner—well, that is nuclear power!

Guard your thoughts. Hold your cards to your chest. The more people press and cajole you to be “honest,” to make your “contribution,” the more they are simply playing into your hands. Wait … waaaaait … not yet … hold your tongue …

When you do speak, do so in short concise sentences, and do not say everything that is on your mind. He will go crazy over what was not said. She will seek to add to what you were intending to say (or so she thinks), had you kept speaking. When they do this, they will invariably let you know their thoughts, their motivations, and their agendas. Handy. Also, when the meeting or conversation is over, their every thought will be about you: what you possibly meant (or was it?), and what you left unsaid.Voila! An image of Mystery and Power, created.

Copyright, Monte E Wilson, 2010

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Have you ever noticed how many people expect you to share your every thought, to be “honest” about your feelings regarding everything being discussed, and then insist on interpreting every word you have spoken?"

No, I've never noticed this!! In my experience, people don't ordinarily give a flip what you're every thought or feeling is! (and why should they?)

Monte Wilson said...

I suppose it depends on the industry or office? As a corporate trainer and executive coach, I have found that the push for "contribution" is quite typical. Part of this is legit, as, "Hey, you are on this team for a reason, so act (talk) like it!"

Then there are also those team members whom I described here in this post. They want you to keep talking so as to ascertain where you are coming from, what your agenda is, etc. for their own political machinations. Obviously, my experience is different from your here, because I see this all the time.

Your "why should they?" intrigues me. If they want the team to actually BE a team, then they need to know what the team is thinking regarding the topic at hand, and, in some cases anyway, what is being experienced (felt), so as to know how to proceed. If this doesn't occur, then either everyone is on the same page and we have a very brief meeting, or no one cares which is problematic, or no one wants to cross the team leader, which means there is no "team."

Joseph said...

This reminds me of an interview with a college graduate who had been living the heavy-duty transparent life as evidenced by his Facebook account (which someone in the office had access to). Being someone who valued openess at all costs he fell right into the most obvious interview trap of giving out too much information about himself. The height of his folly (or transparency) was when we asked him in the interview to tell us what "really motivates" him in life. After a brief moment of thoughtfulness he told us that would be "pussy."

Interview over.

Monte Wilson said...

This is a far far more common idiocy than some of my readers realize. I have been in quite a number of team meetings or discussions between employees and supervisors where the individual (usually in their 20s) behaves and talks as if he were at a frat party. The attitude is "Hey, this is who I am." Good for you. Hope you like being unemployed ... or at least marginalized, never ever getting the promotion you hoped for.

And Facebook has tanked more people than they realize. People, PEOPLE, your employer knows every word and photo posted. And, yes, they know how to get around Friends Only.

Sarah Moffat said...

Oh crap. They know how to get around "Friends only!?"

This will be my mother's favorite blog you've written all year. I promise.

Monte Wilson said...

ROFL

Sure. Easiest way is "someone who knows someone" who is a FB Friend. Doesn't take all that much time to Pierce the Wall of Secrecy!

Many of the businesses I work with have people in HR whose main job is to surf social networking sites of employees and potential new hires!

Rule of thum should be, if you don't want your boss (or parents!) to see it/read it, don't publish it!

Monte Wilson said...

"Thum" was a great Norse philosopher.

Sarah Moffat said...

Haha.
My profile is pretty locked down and, lucky for me, both my parents are my "friends" on facebook so I don't worry TOO much... but I think there is a LOT to be said for mystery. My father, actually, is the perfect example of that. In the workplace, I know, people hang on every word he says because he measures them so precisely.

Camille said...

Her father (as you yourself very well know) says one word to everyone else's 50 words so, yes. People lean in and listen when he speaks. Monte, this blog is, absolutely, a truism, raw in its subtle power. Hats off to you for ringing the bell, yet again. (And she's right, this IS my new favorite...of all time!)

Sarah Moffat said...

I may not be an Alchemist of Silence... but I am almost always right. That is another truism.

Anonymous said...

Isn’t all this about manipulating others? I am uncomfortable appearing as someone I am NOT so as to take up space in the minds of the Powers That Be.

Monte Wilson said...

First, I am not suggestion you play a role that is contrary to your ethics or character. This is not about character or Who You Are: this is about appearances.

Second, while the word “manipulation” usually conjures images of con men, I believe it is a value-neutral word that only takes on a positive or negative meaning when we ask, Toward What End? It is like the word “ambitious.” Ambition is great, even necessary for progress and success. If, however, my ambition leads me to behave in ways that are unethical, then it’s not so great. Or so I believe.

Third, isn’t “dressing for success” a form of “manipulation”? I assume you dress "just so," so as to create an image of professionalism? How is this different from taking on (psychologically "dressing")a certain role that communicates power and authority?

Fourth, if it helps you, maybe you can think about what I have written in the last few posts in terms of “managing your image”?